S3Semi contains affiliate links and is a member of the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, eBay affiliate program, Etsy Affiliate Program. If you make a purchase using one of these links, we may receive compensation at no extra cost to you. This helps support our research, testing and writing.

Hantek DSO5102P vs Rigol DS1054Z: Which Budget Oscilloscope Is Better?

The Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1054Z are two very popular entry-level bench oscilloscopes, but they serve slightly different needs.


The Hantek gives you 100 MHz bandwidth and 2 channels, while the Rigol gives you 4 channels and an extremely strong feature ecosystem, though with 50 MHz bandwidth in its base model.


Your choice depends on whether channel count or bandwidth matters more for your projects.

📋 Key Specifications Side-by-Side

SpecificationHantek DSO5102PRigol DS1054Z
Channels2 analog4 analog
Bandwidth100 MHz50 MHz (base model)
Max Sample Rate1 GSa/s1 GSa/s (single-channel mode)
Memory Depth~40k pointsUp to ~12 Mpts (standard)
Display7″ 800×4807″ 800×480
FFT/MathStandardStrong math, multi-channel FFT
Best ForFast analog signalsMulti-signal debugging

✅ Strengths of Each

Hantek DSO5102P

  • Higher bandwidth (100 MHz) gives better headroom for faster signals
  • Good performance for simple analog/sensor work
  • Straightforward 2-channel interface
  • Typically lower cost compared to Rigol

Rigol DS1054Z

  • Four analog channels, ideal for embedded systems, bus debugging, and multi-signal analysis
  • Deep memory, allowing very long captures without losing detail
  • Massive ecosystem: tutorials, community support, walkthroughs
  • Powerful analysis features, including advanced triggering and flexible measurement tools

⚠️ Limitations to Consider

Hantek DSO5102P

  • Only 2 channels, which can be restrictive for embedded work
  • Memory depth is modest by modern standards
  • Not as many workflow conveniences as the Rigol platform

Rigol DS1054Z

  • Base bandwidth is 50 MHz, limiting higher-speed analog views unless upgraded
  • Sample rate decreases as you enable more channels (typical for multi-channel scopes)
  • Slightly more expensive, though the added channels often justify it

🎛 Which Users Each Scope Fits Best

Choose the Hantek DSO5102P if you:

  • Mostly work with analog, audio, sensors, or power electronics
  • Rarely need more than two signals at once
  • Prefer higher bandwidth at a lower cost
  • Want a simple, straightforward workflow

Choose the Rigol DS1054Z if you:

  • Work with embedded systems, microcontrollers, buses, or digital logic
  • Need three or four channels regularly
  • Want deeper memory for long captures
  • Prefer a widely supported, feature-rich ecosystem

🔍 Final Recommendation

If you value extra channels, deep memory, and a proven workflow, the Rigol DS1054Z is the better all-around scope for most engineers.
If you want more bandwidth on a tight budget and only need two channels, the Hantek DSO5102P is a solid option that delivers excellent value.